A doctor, who was the “lead” on a peer-reviewed research paper, investigating the COVID vaccine, is now calling for the “immediate suspension” of the vax. Our friends at The Liberty Daily are all over this story: Doctors who have promoted Covid-19 “vaccines” in the past often find themselves in awkward positions when they come to the realization the jabs are too dangerous to be administered. The shift can be sudden and jarring as it was for Dr. Aseem Malhotra who helped promote the jabs until his own father died from an adverse reaction.
Some, like Dr. Joseph Fraiman, work their way through the changing mindset over time. Dr. Fraiman participated in a comprehensive, peer-reviewed study last year that determined there were dangers with the jabs. He wanted more studies done, but he did not go so far as to call for them to be halted.
As John McClane from the Die Hard series might say, “Welcome to the party, pal.”
Dr. Fraiman is clearly frustrated that his study, which was released after peer review last August, has not received corporate media attention.
This is a blip from the research:
Introduction: In 2020, prior to COVID-19 vaccine rollout, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations and Brighton Collaboration created a priority list, endorsed by the World Health Organization, of potential adverse events relevant to COVID-19 vaccines. We leveraged the Brighton Collaboration list to evaluate serious adverse events of special interest observed in phase III randomized trials of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.
Methods: Secondary analysis of serious adverse events reported in the placebo-controlled, phase III randomized clinical trials of Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (NCT04368728 and NCT04470427), focusing analysis on potential adverse events of special interest identified by the Brighton Collaboration.
Results: Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were associated with an increased risk of serious adverse events of special interest, with an absolute risk increase of 10.1 and 15.1 per 10,000 vaccinated over placebo baselines of 17.6 and 42.2 (95% CI -0.4 to 20.6 and -3.6 to 33.8), respectively. Combined, the mRNA vaccines were associated with an absolute risk increase of serious adverse events of special interest of 12.5 per 10,000 (95% CI 2.1 to 22.9). The excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest surpassed the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group in both Pfizer and Moderna trials (2.3 and 6.4 per 10,000 participants, respectively).
Discussion: The excess risk of serious adverse events found in our study points to the need for formal harm-benefit analyses, particularly those that are stratified according to risk of serious COVID-19 outcomes such as hospitalization or death.
These are the doctors who were involved:
Louisiana State University – Lallie Kemp Regional Medical Center
Navarre Health Service
Bond University – Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) – Jonathan and Karin Fielding School of Public Health
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)
Robert M. Kaplan
University of Maryland – School of Pharmacy
Note: Funding Information: This study had no funding support.
So, looks like the research was bipartisan.
You can download the entire research paper here.
Well, now, that lead doctor is calling to suspend the vaccine.
Lead author of peer reviewed research re-analysing Pfizer & Moderna trials on mRNA vaccine @JosephFraiman calls for immediate suspension of jab due to serious harms.
‘We have conclusive evidence that the vaccines are inducing sudden cardiac death’
This is huge 🔥 pic.twitter.com/bS3A1ui561
— Dr Aseem Malhotra (@DrAseemMalhotra) January 9, 2023
There are some interesting comments from folks online:
“mRNA vaxes start to lose efficacy after 3 months and the “first” trials on them were exactly 3 months long … this can’t be a coincidence. I think they were earlier, unreleased trials and they knew in advance when they lose efficacy. They are holding so much back from us.”
“Dr. Malhotra, Pfizer & Moderna & FDA had to have known in trials (Naomi Wolf) which means the FDA should have halted the trials & refused approval. Why didn’t they? How did this get to EUA? This is how the FDA handles a high number of AEs for any other drug but not for this mRNA?”
“I suppose better late than never, but I will always believe that none of this is accidental or innocent.”
“Pfizer is going to make tens of billions of USD On sales. “This is huge” doesn’t matter to them. It is nothing before their influence. We are with you. But you have to figure out a better way to stop them.”
Back in the 70s, the government pulled the Swine Flu vaccine after a handful of people died. Why won’t they do that now? What has changed?
I’m glad you’re here, WayneDupree.com comments! Please maintain polite and on-topic conversations. You could see comments from our Community Managers, who will be identified by a “WD Staff” or “Staff” label, in order to promote fruitful and civil discussions. We stop accepting comments on articles three days after they are posted in order to provide the optimal user experience. The conversations forums on WayneDupree.com welcome comments for an unlimited period of time. For further information, please refer to our community policies.
SIGN UP HERE and join us!
Follow Wayne on Rumble!